Revanth Reddy’s ‘Gift’ to Chandrababu Naidu Triggers Political Storm
YSRCP alleges Revanth Reddy gave a political “gift” to Chandrababu Naidu, sparking controversy. Here’s what the claim means and the full story.
What Gift Did Revanth Reddy Give Chandrababu Naidu? Here’s the Truth Behind the ClaimA fresh political controversy has erupted after allegations surfaced that Telangana Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy gave a “gift” to Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu. The claim, however, does not involve any physical or material present but is being described as a political advantage.
The allegation was made by leaders of the YSR Congress Party (YSRCP), who accused Revanth Reddy of indirectly benefiting Chandrababu Naidu through his stance on an inter-state irrigation issue.
What Is the Alleged “Gift”?According to YSRCP leaders, the so-called “gift” refers to Revanth Reddy’s statement claiming that he convinced Chandrababu Naidu to halt the Rayalaseema Lift Irrigation Project. The opposition argues that this claim politically favors Naidu by helping him manage criticism surrounding water-sharing disputes between Telangana and Andhra Pradesh.
YSRCP spokespersons described this move as a political favour, alleging that it compromised Andhra Pradesh’s irrigation interests while strengthening Naidu’s political narrative.
No Physical Gift, Only Political AllegationsIt is important to clarify that:
- ❌ No material or personal gift was exchanged
- ❌ No official confirmation supports the opposition’s accusation
- ✔️ The term “gift” is being used symbolically in political rhetoric
So far, neither Revanth Reddy nor Chandrababu Naidu has issued a detailed response to these allegations.
Political Reactions IntensifyThe remarks have intensified political debate, with opposition parties questioning:
- Whether inter-state water issues are being politicized
- If public statements were made without formal agreements
- How such claims impact Telangana–Andhra Pradesh relations
Political analysts believe the controversy is part of a broader narrative battle ahead of upcoming elections.
ConclusionAt present, the “gift” mentioned in political discussions is not a physical offering but an alleged political benefit claimed by opposition parties. Until official clarifications are issued or evidence is presented, the issue remains a matter of political interpretation rather than established fact.
